Voting for Baseball Hall of Fame is unfair

Fans of baseball and many other persons seem to be anxious by results of voting for the Hall of Fame. Certain great players have not been elected for the Baseball Hall of Fame. It is not surprisingly that you also ask why they have not been supported. Under guidelines of voting, those that have shown brilliant baseball skills and contributed to their teams evidentially should be elected. It goes without saying that such baseball players, as Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and certain other individuals have demonstrated great abilities and accomplishments while playing professionally. Why aren’t they elected for the Baseball Hall of Fame?
A lot of voters claim that they will never support those that have ever been related to anabolic steroids and/or other related products. Dopers should be punished. Future generations should understand that they will never really succeed, if they administer doping products.
What would you do, if you were a member of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America? Would you support steroid users?
In fact, voters never possess full information about admitted and suspected steroid users. You can’t prove that Roger Clemens has really administered performance-enhancing drugs. Numerous persons have suspicions but there is no any proof. How may voters refuse to support him? Are they sure that he has applied anabolic steroids and other forbidden medications? –No, they aren’t. That’s why it is unfair to keep Roger Clemens out of the Baseball Hall of Fame just because of suspicions.
While some voters are ready to support suspected steroid users, they say that they will never vote for an admitted consumer of steroids. Although it seems to be fair, let analyze the situation better! Have steroids played any significant role in success of certain baseball player? For example, if even Roger Clemens has taken doping products, it is possible to convince anyone that he has had great success not because of steroid use. Great accomplishment of this prominent baseball player have been manifested before his alleged usage of steroids. According to certain affirmations, Roger Clemens has administered steroids since 1998 and then in 2000 and 2001.  But the most brilliant achievements have been done by him before 1998. Thus, nobody can state that steroids have helped Roger Clemens to succeed in professional baseball. That’s why he should be elected for the Hall of Fame.
Furthermore, why are many individuals inclined to demonize just dopers? Isn’t it the society that presses sportspeople to start using anabolic steroids and other related products?